|
|
Yes, I’m an alcoholic –
recovered and cured
Dick B. © 2005
http://www.dickb.com/index.shtml
I am an active, recovered, cured AA. And I am a devotee and fan of all four
editions of A.A.'s Big Book, Alcoholics Anonymous. I look at the Big Book as the
standard for truth about the A.A. program of recovery as it is today. I commend
the reading of the First, Third, and Fourth Edition basic texts but not
particularly the personal stories which have been the subject of endless
editorial tinkering by A.A. service people.
The basic text stands as a bulwark against the meat-market, relationships,
psychobabble, nonsense gods, and whining that characterize so many meetings
today. But the proposal I make is that you consider what the Big Book was
originally intended to do and what it is apparently purposed to do today. I
believe it is quite fair to say that all editions were intended to provide an
explicit guide to A.A.'s program of recovery.
They were not intended as a source of revenue for Bill Wilson, his wife and her
foundation, Lois's relatives, or even Wilson's girl friend. And that raises the
question as to why so many millions of copies have been printed, revised,
edited, and fed into the marketplace, instead of becoming a free source of
information for AAs of all times. Part of the burgeoning sales program can be
attributed to treatment programs and their need to show affiliation with A.A.
Part too to government purchases for the same or similar reasons. Part has been
to produce more and more revenue for an organization that was supposed to be
non-profit and self-supporting but certainly isn't at the national level.
But let's go to the Big Book and all its editions. It's not the muck-raking that
will help alcoholics; it's the merit or intended merit of the program of
recovery. One starting place is the beginning of the Book project in 1938. The
original A.A. program was developed, tested, and proven by the fellowship in
Akron as led by Dr. Bob. It was a program that was described by Frank T. Amos to
John D. Rockefeller, Jr. as having seven points that are listed in DR. BOB and
the Good Oldtimers. It very much resembled the program of the world-wide United
Christian Endeavor Society in which Dr. Bob was actively involved as a youngster
in the St. Johnsbury North Congregational Church. The facets of that program
were Confession of Christ, Bible study, prayer meetings, Quiet Hour, reading of
religious literature, fellowship, witness, and support of your own church based
on the foundational and declared purpose of love and service. And a fair-minded
look at the Christian Endeavor program and the Akron program will disclose that
the two were very very similar in principles and practices. The Akron program
was described by Dr. Bob as a Christian Fellowship. It embodied all the elements
and purpose of the Christian Endeavor Society. And its meetings were described,
by those who were there, as old fashioned prayer meetings and old fashioned
revival meetings. The Akron program produced a 75% success rate by 1938 B Wilson
sometimes claimed 80% or even 100% among non-psychotic alcoholics. The
qualifying requirement, however, labeled as successes only those real alcoholics
who really tried. And these numbered 40 when Wilson and Smith felt they had a
program. The success and number have been well documented by my fellow
researcher and colleague Richard K. in several of his works including The First
Forty. These were not people whose stories were or were not in the First Edition
of the Big Book. Some recent critics of the early program have asserted that
most of those people died drunk or lost their sobriety. The fact, even if true,
is irrelevant. For the original Akron program was certainly not left in the
hands of a group of failures. The names and data on the 40 successes were known.
By contrast, the choice of the people for the stories was based largely on
Wilson's desire to have diversity the butcher, the baker, and the candlestick
maker that would establish A.A. was for those of various creeds, races,
religions, vocations, etc.
It was the work and cures achieved by the 40, largely from Akron, that marked
the basis for the decision to report the program via a guiding text. And Bill
Wilson was authorized by a split-vote at an Akron meeting to write such a text.
However, the text did not proceed as contemplated. Before long, all the Akron
references to the Bible, Jesus Christ, and the essential verses in the Book of
James, the Sermon on the Mount, and 1 Corinthians, were simply deleted. Wilson
then proceeded to fashion his own program of recovery. His text proceeded from
his own experience, not the experiences of Dr. Bob or the Akron people. He
alleged the program was founded on six word-of-mouth steps that were, though
varied, being used in the fellowship. However, there is no evidence that there
were any such agreed six steps or even that the Oxford Group from which the
steps came had six steps or any steps at all. Nonetheless, several of Wilson's
six points did cover ideas taken from the Oxford Group, of which A.A. was an
offshoot at the beginning.
As Wilson proceeded with his text, he chose on his own to expand his alleged six
steps to Twelve Steps. He then asserted in his text that these (twelve) were the
steps we took. But there were no steps, and nobody had taken twelve or any
specifically identified steps when Bill wrote them. Then where did they come
from? Dr. Bob said he didn't write the steps and had nothing to do with the
writing of them. He said the basic ideas came from their studies and efforts in
the Bible, though not in terse and tangible form. Others thought they came from
the Oxford Group and, to a certain extent, that is accurate. See my title The
Oxford Group and Alcoholics Anonymous.
But Wilson himself eventually gave the most accurate description of their
source. He said they came primarily and directly from the teachings of Rev.
Samuel M. Shoemaker, Jr., Rector of Calvary Episcopal Church in New York. Now
the Akronites knew little if anything about Shoemaker personally, though they
did read some of his books. On the other hand, Shoemaker was the principal
lieutenant in the United States of Oxford Group founder Frank Buchman. Wilson
and his wife knew many of the Oxford Group crowd and attended many of their
meetings. And Shoemaker was in close touch with Bill Wilson, his proposed step
ideas, and his Big Book manuscript from the fellowship's earliest point in 1934
to the date its text was published in 1939. This seems well supported by the
fact that Wilson first asked Shoemaker to write the Twelve Steps, but Shoemaker
declined in Wilson's favor.
And I have documented how much of the Big Book and Step language comes from
Shoemaker in my New Light on Alcoholism title. But Shoemaker was not the only
source of Wilson's creative text. Dr. Carl Jung of Switzerland was the source of
the conversion experience as the solution to alcoholism. Professor William James
of Harvard, though long dead, was the source that validated Wilson's own unique
hot flash conversion experience and also the source of the idea that self
surrender was the turning point in any religious life with Shoemaker being
James's actual spokesperson. Dr. William D. Silkworth largely in his Doctor's
Opinion contributed the disease theory ideas in the program with respect to
Wilson's first step. And Wilson himself then salted his text with some New
Thought and New Age ideas that he apparently had seen or heard in the literature
or talks of Ralph Waldo Trine, William James, Emanuel Swedenborg, Emmet Fox,
Charles Fillmore, and even Mary Baker Eddy. These included mystic references to
the fourth dimension, Spirit of the Universe, Great Reality, Universal Mind,
cosmic consciousness, etc. Finally, Wilson curiously borrowed some of his
language from the unsuccessful lay therapist Richard Peabody, as set forth in
The Common Sense of Drinking. Peabody had alleged that there was no cure for
alcoholism, that once an alcoholic always an alcoholic, and that half measures
avail you nothing. Ironically, Peabody proved his own points, as Wilson
observed, since Peabody died drunk. But his ideas were not reflective of the
contemporaneous decade in which A.A. pioneers did claim they were cured and were
cured, by their own definition. Peabody simply left his condemnation as a legacy
adopted by Bill in his Tenth Step language. Note, however, that the rest of the
Steps and much of the Big Book language is undeniably Shoemaker in imprint and
appearance. You can reflect on this in my title Twelve Steps for You.
And now let's return to the Big Book and its four editions. It is not reflective
of the Akron program that gave rise to A.A. It is largely the product of Bill's
steps that came from Shoemaker's teachings about the Oxford Group's
life-changing techniques. Its virtue is that it gives, as to most of the steps,
very explicit instructions as to how to take them and thereby recover subject to
a daily reprieve contingent on the maintenance of one's spiritual condition. As
I said, it has given purpose to those in Twelve Fellowships who want something
other than bonding in meetings and a vehicle for complaint and expression of
misery. I am a strong advocate of the A.A. support system. I feel it is without
equal. I feel that it would be difficult to replicate in any other fellowship.
But as the Big Book says, if taken by itself, it would never produce recovery.
The Big Book inculcates the idea that recovery comes from taking a group of
life-changing steps, experiencing a change, carrying a message, and practicing
principles learned.
Unfortunately, therein lies some of its weakness in that it has strayed far from
the power of the Creator as the real source of healing, left that explicit
message in the dust, and lost the principles that were originally spelled out in
the unmentioned Bible. The personal stories are a different item. Unfortunately,
as they have been repeatedly edited, deleted, augmented, and modified, they
represent little more than the diversity of views in a fellowship that does not
unite behind the steps of recovery. My recommendation, then, goes to the basic
text. If study of that text is combined with active participation in the A.A.
fellowship to the end that recovery is the objective, support is a vital
component, discipline is needed and imparted, sponsorship is used and enjoyed,
and love for and service to the fellowship are incorporated, you have a very
valuable program. Personally, I find nothing in the Big Book text that drives me
away from God, the Bible, Jesus Christ, or my own religious affiliation. Those
things come from raucous and ill-informed meeting talk. It's tough to hear, but
it perhaps reflects the secularism is today's society.
And he who knows the Big Book knows that Almighty God is referred to explicitly
over 400 times in the Big Book. He who knows our history knows that God as we
understood Him is not a license to hunt for rainbows, radiators, or doorknobs,
but a challenge to gain understanding of God Almighty, our Creator. How do we
know that? Because the phrase came, not surprisingly, from the frequent teaching
of Sam Shoemaker in books, articles, sermons, and conversation that you should
surrender as much of yourself as you understand to as much of God as you
understand. Shoemaker's challenge echoed in the language of the Big Book--was to
find God, know God, and gain an understanding of God by revelation and primarily
from His Word. That was Shoemaker's view, and it was not lost to Wilson although
the understood Him phrase has given rise to much of the idolatrous
philosophizing about goofy gods that you hear manufactured in meetings. In sum,
then, if you want to dive into A.A. and recover from alcoholism, you'll get your
hugs and embraces through the meetings. I can almost guarantee that, but you'll
get the intended thrust of the recovery program only by reading the basic text
found in the Big Book. You'll find it lots more helpful if you also learn A.A.'s
early history and Bible roots. That's what I did; and with God's help and the
continuing avoidance of temptation, I've had a wonderful new life at eighty
years in age and almost twenty years in sobriety.
END

Dick B. © 2005

This website is designed and maintained by
American Creations of Maui
Contact:
webmaster@americreations.com; (661)965-2536
American Creations of Maui
Maui Website
Design at
http://americreations.com
|