|
|
Alcoholics Anonymous,
Its Christian Endeavor Root, and A.A. Co-founder Dr. Bob
By Dick B.
Copyright 2005. All rights reserved
A New Historical Research Challenge
Whenever I find some solid evidence
about A.A. history that no historian has mentioned, I become interested and
challenged. Further, whenever I find that neither Bill W. nor the current A.A.
publishing group has made mention of the item, I become even more interested and
challenged. Finally, when I see that the evidence has a direct bearing on the
early A.A. program in Akron, as reported to Rockefeller by Frank Amos – our
trustee-to-be – the challenge becomes a priority. And if no one mentions a
challenge that smacks of religious, church, Christianity, Bible, or alcoholism
cure, I know that I’m on to an investigative quest that will be welcomed by the
many who just plain want to know. That’s the case here.
The Christian Endeavor root of A.A. is such a challenge. No AA historian other
than Richard K. and I seems to have mentioned it at all. Nor did Bill Wilson or
his latter-day, well-paid publishing crew. More and more forcefully, the
“headquarters” crowd began pushing the idea “A.A. is not a religious society,
since it requires no definite religious belief as a condition of membership”
(See 44 Questions. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1952, p.
19). This revisionist theme has nonetheless been rejected by the many courts
that have ruled on its flaws.
Yet A.A.’s reticent co-founder Dr. Bob certainly pointed to the Christian
Endeavor root.. First, in an almost negative context, Dr. Bob said in his
personal story in the A.A. Big Book:
“From childhood through high school I was more or less forced to go to church,
Sunday School and evening service, Monday night Christian Endeavor and sometimes
to Wednesday evening prayer meeting”
(Alcoholics Anonymous,
4th ed., p. 173)
The foregoing was supplemented with Dr. Bob’s further statement that he resolved
thereafter “never to darken the doors of a church” except where circumstances
made it seem unwise to do otherwise.” However, more than a decade after A.A.’s
founding, Dr. Bob commented as to Bill and himself (The Co-Founders of
Alcoholics Anonymous: Biographical Sketches Their Last Major Talks. NY:
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1972, 1975, pp. 11-14):
“We had both been associated with
the Oxford Group, Bill in New York, for five months, and I in Akron, for two and
a half years. Bill had acquired their idea of service. I had not, but I had done
an immense amount of reading they had recommended. I had refreshed my memory of
the Good Book, and I had had excellent training in that as a youngster. . . .
“I’m somewhat allergic to work, but I felt that I should continue to increase my
familiarity with the Good Book and also should read a good deal of standard
literature, possibly of a scientific nature. So I did cultivate the habit of
reading. I think I’m not exaggerating when I say I have probably averaged an
hour a day for the last 15 years. . . .
“At that point, our stories didn’t amount to anything to speak of. When we
started in on Bill D., we had no Twelve Steps, either; we had no Traditions. But
we were convinced that the answer to our problems was in the Good Book. . . .
“It wasn’t until 1938 that the teachings and efforts and studies that had been
going on were crystallized in the form of the Twelve Steps. I didn’t write the
Twelve Steps. I had nothing to do with the writing of them. . . . We already had
the basic ideas, though not in terse and tangible form. We got them, as I said,
as a result of our study of the Good Book.”
I found after much further research
that his statement does not square with the facts—facts still under further
extensive investigation by my colleague Richard K. Nor were the facts presented
in full or in the context as to Dr. Bob’s other statements and views about the
Bible, his training as a youngster, and the ideas which he later promulgated as
he worked with over 5,000 alcoholics subsequent to A.A.’s 1935 founding.
I will only summarize here my previously published detailed evidence about Dr.
Bob’s youth and his statements about the Bible, his training in the Bible and
Bible study, his prayer life, his quiet times, and his church life. In outline
form, here are the points:
Dr. Bob’s stated that he had
attended three or four church services and meetings in week at the North
Congregational Church in St. Johnsbury, Vermont. He said that when he resumed
his religious studies, he had refreshed his memory of the Bible and had received
excellent training in that in church and through Christian Endeavor as a
youngster. His son told me his father had read the Bible completely through
three times in his “refreshment” period. His daughter told me her father read
the Bible every day. Dr. Bob told his son he had read for an hour every night,
drunk or sober, for many years. Dr. Bob spoke of the immense amount of
literature he read. Scads and scads of books were found in his home, under his
bed, and in the homes of his kids after they were alleged to have been thrown or
given away. And we now know the broad scope of the Biblical, devotional,
Christian literature he read, just by looking at the remnant books we have found
mentioned by family and friends or found in possession of his children. There is
no doubt that, from early AA’s beginnings, Dr. Bob set aside a quiet time three
times each day for Bible study, prayer, and reflection. He read and circulated a
large number of Christian books on the Bible, Jesus Christ, prayer, quiet time,
the sermon on the mount, the Book of James, and 1 Corinthians 13. We also have
Dr. Bob’s own frequent statement as to the “absolutely essential” study by AAs
of the sermon, James, and Corinthians. Also, Bob’s statement that AAs started
the day with James, Corinthians, and the Sermon. We also have examined with care
Dr. Bob’s specific interest in The Runner’s Bible where James is much discussed,
his interest in at least four well-known commentaries on the Sermon on the
Mount, and his enthusiastic circulation of Henry Drummond’s The Greatest Thing
in the World.
I have a news article from The Tidings (A Roman Catholic paper) printed some
eight years after A.A.’s founding. The article reported on the speeches by Dr.
Bob and Bill on the same platform in Los Angeles before 4500 at the Shrine
Auditorium. There, and once again, Dr. Bob explicitly urged that AAs should
cultivate the habit of prayer and of reading the Bible…
Despite incomplete and erroneous reporting, we now know that Dr. Bob not only
attended Protestant Christian churches frequently—first as a youngster and later
in Akron at St. Lukes, Westside Presbyterian Church, and finally St. Paul’s
Episcopal Church in Akron.
I particularly want to mention here
again the two illuminating statements Dr. Bob made about clergy and churches.
His son made the statements to me personally. Smitty, his son, said: (1) Dr.
Bob’s real beef was with “sky pilots”—a not uncommon, derogatory statement about
preachers of that day. (2) Dr. Bob was far more interested in the “message” than
the “messenger”—an interesting declaration of Dr. Bob’s avowed preference for
Bible study, prayer and the seeking of guidance, reading Christian literature,
and using devotionals And I believe these comments may explain his alleged
aversion to church and his patent involvement in Bible study, prayer, guidance,
Christian literature, and using devotionals like The Upper Room, Daily Strength
for Daily Needs, and My Utmost for His Highest. It may also explain his
infrequent mention of his church—though he and Anne were charter members of the
Presbyterian Church in Akron, though he tooks his kids to Sunday School, and he
recommended that early AAs attend church..
The challenge? Did Dr. Bob’s younger days in church, his prayer meetings, and
Christian Endeavor impact on his later beliefs, actions, A.A. ideas, and the
“fixing” of drunks in Akron AA.? Another challenge: What was the background of
Christian Endeavor itself; and what ideas of that society bear resemblance to
those of pioneer AA? Still another challenge: What, in context, was Dr. Bob’s
real view of church, of clergy, of prayer, of prayer meetings, of the Christian
Endeavor program, and of the Bible itself?
Some of the answers will be forthcoming in the forthcoming months of research
and writing.
Preliminary Glimpses at Christian Endeavor
From its Founding Through the days of Dr. Bob’s Participation
The Genesis of the Christian Endeavor Society
The first society was organized on February 2, 1881. (See Francis E. Clark.
Christian Endeavor in all Lands. Boston, MA: The United Society of Christian
Endeavor, 1886, pp. 35, 41, 621).
Rev. Francis E. Clark, pastor Williston Church in Portland, Maine, formed the
society in the parlor of his home at 62 Neal Street—the parsonage of Williston
Church. Members consisted of boys and girls in the “Mizpah Circle”—a missionary
circle for young people which was led by the pastor’s wife. During the February
Mizpah meeting, Clark framed a constitution for the society and called it
“Williston Young People’s Society of Christian Endeavor.” The “greatest stress
was on the religious features.” The society was to be “an out-and-out Christian
society” The activities “were to centre around the weekly young people’s prayer
meeting.” W. H. Pennell, the teacher of the Young Men’s Bible Class, carefully
explained the society and its constitution and led all the young people present
in signing the new constitution. Several clauses of the constitution are
historically instructive and bear repeating here (For the foregoing points and
the constitution, see Francis E. Clark. Memories of Many Men In Many Lands: An
Autobiography. Boston, MA: United Society of Christian Endeavor, 1922, pp.
77-87):
“Object. Its object shall be to
promote an earnest Christian life among its members, to increase their mutual
acquaintance, and to make them more useful in the service of God. . . .
Officers. The officers of this society shall be a President, Vice President and
Secretary. There shall also be a Prayer meeting Committee of five a Social
Committee of five, and a Lookout Committee of Five.
Duties of Officers. . . . The Prayer meeting Committee shall have in charge the
Friday evening prayer-meeting;
The Prayer-meeting. It is expected that all the members of the society will be
present at every meeting unless detained by some absolute necessity and that
each one will take some part however slight in every meeting. The meetings will
be held just one hour and at the close some time may be taken for introductions
and social intercourse if desired. Once each month an Experience meeting shall”
[no further portions shown in autobiography].
About Christian Endeavor Founder
Francis E. Clark
Francis Edward Clark was born on September 12, 1851 in the village of Aylmer,
Province of Quebec, or Lower Canada, as it was then called. His ancestors,
however, had lived in “the Old Bay State” for two centuries. His ancestral
lineage was peopled with deacons and pastors and descendents who were members of
the Orthodox Congregational Church. His young parents went to the Canadian
frontier on other pursuits, but both died when Francis was quite young. He said,
“All of my boyhood was spent in two Puritan families. . . . My mother and
brother were members of the Presbyterian church, in which I, too, was dedicated
to God’s service.” However, very soon after his mother’s death, his uncle, Rev.
Edward Warren Clark, of Auburndale, Mass., came to Aylmer and took him to the
Auburndale home. The uncle was the first pastor of the newly-formed
Congregational Church in Auburndale. Because of ill health, his uncle was
obliged to give up his pastorate. But he was elected chaplain of the
Massachusetts Senate and Overseer of Harvard College, soon becoming chaplain of
the Forty-seventh Regiment of Volunteers in the Civil War.
On the uncle’s return from the war, the family moved to New Hampshire; and the
young Francis attended Claremont academy. From there, Francis was enrolled in
Kimball Union Academy in Meridian, New Hampshire. On graduation in 1869, he
entered the Dartmouth class of ’73. He graduated number 12 in his class and had
received a Phi Beta Kappa “key.” Incidentally, Francis commented at some length
on the excessive drinking during his years at Dartmouth—something that is part
of the Dr. Bob story at Dartmouth as well. In 1873, Francis decided to study for
the ministry and entered Andover, which he characterized as “the great
theological seminary of New England.” Andover was Congregational in
denomination. Near the end of his senior year at Andover, he was called to the
pastorate of the Williston Church of Portland, Maine (For the foregoing
materials, see Clark, Memories, supra, pp. 1-66).
A Brief Digression To the Period of Dr. Bob’s Youth.
Perhaps not by accident, A.A. literature has chosen to report little about Dr.
Bob’s youth. This may be a blessing for those of us who are taking a fresh
start, a fresh approach, and a fresh viewpoint. The question concerns just
exactly what Dr. Bob did as a youngster in the North Congregational Church at
St. Johnsbury and just exactly what he was seeing, hearing, learning, and
practicing in the Christian Endeavor Society at his church and even elsewhere.
Those questions are being researched right now!
Here’s what AA does tell us about Dr. Bob’s youth. The facts provide an adequate
start and framework that can point us toward his early religious years and
religious training.
Robert Holbrook Smith was born August 8, 1879 in the family home at Central and
Summer Streets in St. Johnsbury, Vermont. Judge and Mrs. Walter Perrin Smith
were his parents. The Judge had a distinguished career as Probate Judge, state’s
attorney, state legislator, superintendent of St. Johnsbury schools, director of
one bank, and president of another. He died in 1918; and he had taught Sunday
school for 40 years! Dr. Bob’s mother was said to have felt “that the way to
success and salvation lay through strict parental supervision, no-nonsense
education, and regular spiritual devotion.”
From 1885 to 1894, Bob went to Summer Street elementary school, two blocks from
his home. In 1894, Bob was 15 years old and entered St. Johnsbury Academy—an
independent secondary school “for the intellectual, moral, and religious
training of boys and girls in northeastern Vermont.” In his senior year at St.
Johnsbury, he met his bride-to-be Anne Ripley Smith at a dance in the academy
gym. Seventeen years later, they were married. Bob graduated from St. Johnsbury
Academy in 1898. He then set off for four years at Dartmouth College, sixty
miles south at Hanover, New Hampshire. He graduated in 1902 and by that time was
an illustrious graduate of the college drinking “fraternity.” Sadly—by
comparison with the endless biographies, stories of, by, and about Bill Wilson
and his life—A.A. has devoted only 23 pages to the foregoing general facts in
the official biography of Bob’s life (See DR. BOB and the Good Oldtimers: A
Biography, with recollections of early A.A. in the Midwest. NY: Alcoholics
Anonymous World Services., Inc., 1980, pp. 1-23). Regrettably, most of these
pages contain little more of religious and spiritual significance than a Dr. Bob
drunkalog, not even in the words of Dr. Bob.
As to Bill Wilson, Bill himself, A.A., and a host of biographers have provided
us with details about Wilson’s birth behind a bar, his renunciation of church,
his grandfather, his boomerang, his violin, his first love, his second love and
then wife Lois, his Burr and Burton Academy, a hobo motorcycle ride, stock
market meanderings, Lois’s Swedenborgian religion, the pair’s marriage in the
Swedenborgian church, and a some information about Bill’s Army days and law
school attendance.
When it comes to reporting details about Dr. Bob, A.A. has been favored with
nothing about Judge Smith’s religious convictions and teachings to Bob; Grandma
Smith’s religious beliefs, activities, and communications with her son; the
family’s membership in St. Johnsbury’s North Congregational Church, its prayer
meetings, church services, Bible studies, and quiet hours; the status of its
Christian Endeavor Society there; and the CE activities of that particular
church society. Nor has it even mentioned what Bob learned from the church, from
the Bible, from Christian Endeavor, from his parents, and from the religiously-
oriented academy he attended. And that is where part of our research is now
beginning.
Christian Endeavor Growth From 1881 to 1902—the date of Dr. Bob’s graduation
from college at Dartmouth.
The growth of Christian Endeavor from its twenty member society in Williston
Church in 1881 to its status at the time of Dr. Bob’s graduation from college in
1902 is absolutely astonishing. Though Congregational in origin, Christian
Endeavor met the needs of youth and the need of churches of various Protestant
denominations to court, encourage, and instruct the young people in the service
of Christ. Its influence on churches and youngsters became world-wide in span
and duration.
By the time its founder Dr. Francis Clark had written his autobiography in 1922,
Christian Endeavor could say that eighty thousand organizations bore its name
(Clark, Memoirs, supra, p. 699). It could and did say that three hundred
thousand people attended one hundred and fifty different sessions at its 1899
Convention in Detroit (Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, p. 368). It could and
did estimate that about 250,000 Endeavorers every year join the evangelical
churches of the world (Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, p. 338).
Let’s compare, as to historical significance, Wilson’s much-discussed
Washingtonian Society of a century before A.A.’s founding. Society membership,
said Wilson, “passed the hundred thousand mark,” but, said he, it lost sight of
its goal of helping alcoholics. It became embroiled in Abolition and Temperance
matters, quickly faded from the scene after only a few short years of activity,
and had been long dead for a good many decades before A.A. was founded (See
Wilson’s remarks quoted in Pass It On. NY: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services,
Inc., 1984, pp. 325, 354, 366-367; Twelve Steps And Twelve Traditions. NY:
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1952, pp. 178-179).
So too, the “Oxford Group”—the much discussed yet maligned “root” of Bill
Wilson’s A.A. steps. At the beginning, in 1922, its members simply consisted of
a small group of Rev. Frank Buchman’s traveling friends who had formed what they
called “A First Century Christian Fellowship” which soon faded away (See Garth
Lean. Frank Buchman: A Life. London: Constable, 1985, p. 97).
Now, let’s look at a timeline of Christian Endeavor from its founding in 1881 to
the time of Dr. Bob’s graduation from Dartmouth in 1902. The growth, tremendous
size and outreach, and endurance of this Christian fellowship surpass anything
else in the pre-AA history scene.
1881 – February 2, the first society was organized in Williston Church.
October 8, the second society organized in the North Church, Newburyport, Mass.
Before 1882 dawned, there were at least three or four other societies—one in a
Christian church in Rhode Island; another in the St. Lawrence Church of
Portland; another in Burlington, Vermont.
1882 – June 2 – the first convention was held in Williston Church with six
societies of less than 500 members represented and others known to exist.
1883 – 1891 – Societies were rapidly formed in Canada, Hawaii, Ceylon, Foochow,
Africa, England, Australia, Turkey, Japan, Spain, France, Samoa, Mexico, and
Chile. With large conventions in those years and many societies.
1892 – Eleventh Annual Convention was held at Madison Square Garden. Attendance:
30,000.
1893 – 1896 – Societies and conventions involved China, Japan, the Army, South
Africa, Switzerland, Germany, Laos, Scotland, Marshall Islands, India, Hawaii,
Guatemala, the Caroline Islands, Italy, Bulgaria, Mexico, and Burma.
1897 – Sixteenth International Convention in San Francisco. 25,000 journeyed
across the continental United States to be a part of the outreach and activity.
1898 – 1902 – Societies and conventions were organized and met in India, Russia,
Philippines, Jamaica, Portugal, and Persia.
The Washingtonians were washed up in only a few years and long before AA was a
twinkle in Bill Wilson’s eye.. The Oxford Group gained world-wide notice through
the 1930’s; faced stiff opposition from the Roman Catholic hierarchy; ran afoul
of some political ideas; was a basically a one-man charisma show; and soon found
itself splitting in several directions a decade thereafter.
Yet, in the twenty years beginning with1891, Christian Endeavor had stayed
afloat, grown, gained support in many denominations, spawned similar groups in
others, and acquired tens of thousands of identifiable adherents. It had
literature, books, periodicals, newspapers, conventions, world conferences,
offices, officers and trustees, hymnals, summer schools, training schools, and
an ever-increasing support and growth rate. In sum, there was absolutely nothing
similar in form, content, significance, and size in A.A.’s formative years like
the Christian Endeavor Society which was to help instruct and train Dr. Bob in
his youth, and which emphasized Bible, Church, Prayer Meetings, Quiet Hours,
God, Jesus Christ, fellowship, service and witness (For details, see Clark,
Christian Endeavor, supra, pp. 34-88, 621-628).
The Christian Endeavor Society Pledge, Principles, and Practices
The Christian Endeavor Covenant and Pledge
The active member’s pledge used in most societies is as follows:
“Trusting in the Lord Jesus Christ
for strength, I promise Him that I will strive to do whatever He would like to
have me do; that I will make it a rule of my life to pray and to read the Bible
every day, and to support my own church in every way, especially by attending
all her regular Sunday and midweek services, unless prevented by some reason
which I can conscientiously give to my Saviour; and that, just so far as I know
how, throughout my whole life, I will endeavor to lead a Christian life. As an
active member I promise to be true to all my duties, to be present at and take
some part, aside from singing, in every Christian Endeavor prayer-meeting,
unless hindered by some reason which I can conscientiously give to my Lord and
Master. If obliged to be absent from the monthly consecration meeting of the
society, I will, if possible, send at least a verse of Scripture to be read in
response to my name at roll-call” (Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, pp.
251-252).
Interesting also are the first two
of six covenants in the prison-societies of Christian Endeavor:
“First. I will accept Jesus as my
Lord and Saviour.
“Second. I will try to learn and do His will by forming the habit of praying and
carefully reading my Bible daily, and by thinking, speaking, and acting as I
believe He would in my place. . . .” (Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, p. 253).
Rev. Clark said the covenant has
thus been analyzed:
“First, I will read the Bible.
“Second, I will pray.
“Third, I will support my own church.
“Fourth, I will attend the weekly prayer-meeting of the society.
“Fifth, I will take some part in it, aside from singing.
“Sixth, I will perform a special duty at the consecration-meeting if obliged to
be absent” (Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, pp 244-245).
Amos R. Wells, a prolific Endeavor
writer, editor, and leader, wrote the following in his book The Endeavorer’s
Daily Companion:
“Don’t believe in daily prayer and
Bible-reading?
“Don’t believe in taking part in prayer-meetings?
“Don’t believe in going to church?
“Don’t believe in supporting your own church?
“Don’t believe in doing Christ’s will?
“Don’t believe in leading a Christian life?
“Don’t believe in trying to do all these things?
“Don’t believe in promising to try to do them?
“Why, of course you do when it is put that way! This is all you promise in the
pledge—just to try to do them; and the pledge expressly says that you are not to
do them whenever you think Christ would excuse you from them. Certainly no less
excuse should satisfy you, pledge or no pledge” (Clark, Christian Endeavor,
supra, p. 245).
Though we are getting ahead of
ourselves in this article and as to later research, we believe any real student
of Dr. Bob’s remarks will find that A.A.’s co-founder was still doing the daily
prayer and Bible-reading, was still conducting prayer-meetings, was still going
to church, was still supporting his church, was still talking about doing his
Master’s will, was still emphasizing the leading of a Christian life, and was
not only talking about these things throughout his A.A. years, but was urging
these things on his “pigeons”—as he called the new AAs. There is no talk above
of Oxford Group Absolutes, of life-changing, of self-examination and confession
of sin, of conviction, of restitution, or even of some favored ideas in the Book
of James, including James 5:16. The pledge really describes the simple early
A.A. Akron program in bright colors. And, if you add to it, some other Christian
Endeavor principles and practices, you have the very thing that Dr. Bob, his
wife Anne, Henrietta Seiberling, and the Williams couple were holding forth for
the deliverance of those early drunks.
The Christian Endeavor Principles
Rev. Clark believed that the following four principles are the “roots of the
Christian Endeavor tree.” They are, he wrote, the essential and only essential
principles of the Christian Endeavor Society:
1. Confession of Christ.
2. Service for Christ.
3. Fellowship with Christ’s people.
4. Loyalty to Christ’s Church.
As to each of the four, Clark said
following, among other things:
“Confession of Christ is absolutely
necessary in the Christian Endeavor Society. To ensure this are the methods of
the Society adapted in every particular. . . . The true Christian Endeavorer
does not take part to exhibit his rhetoric, or to gain practice in public
speaking, or to show what a logical prayer he can offer to God; but he does take
part to show that he is a Christian, to confess his love for his Lord; and this
confession is as acceptable made by the unlearned, stumbling, lisping Christian
as by the glib and ready phrase-maker. . . The covenant pledge is simply a tried
and proved device to secure frequent confession of Christ. . . . Our form of
confession is the prayer-meeting. Here we acknowledge our faith. . . .”
“Another universal principle of Christian Endeavor is constant service. If
confession is the lungs of the movement, service is its hands and feet. . . . In
ideal society every member is responsible for some definite, particular task. .
.a society whose ideal, like Wesley’s is, ‘At it, and all at it, and always at
it.’”
“Again, I have learned that our fellowship is an essential feature of Christian
Endeavor. . . . This fellowship is not an accident or a matter of chance. It is
an inevitable result of the movement. When the second society was formed,
nineteen years ago, the fellowship began. Then it became interdenominational,
interstate, international, intersocial, intercontinental, and, as some one has
suggested, since ‘Part of the hosts have crossed the flood, And part are
crossing now,’ it has become intermundane.”
Once more, a universal essential of
the Society of Christian Endeavor is fidelity to its own church and the work of
that church. It does not and cannot exist for itself. . . a true society of
Christian Endeavor must live for Christ and the church. Its confession of love
is for Christ, the head, its service is for the church, His bride. . .”
Which reminds me of Dr. Bob’s parting remarks to the A.A. fellowship that its
steps and principles can be simmered to their essence and called “love and
service.” Wonder where he got that idea!
Clark concludes with this commentary on the fundamental, necessary features of
the world-wide movement:
Confession of our love for Christ—devoting ourselves to our Lord and Saviour,
Jesus Christ, so that we do not simply rely on His work of propitiation,
finished on the cross, but view Him as our living King, whose will is law in
every department of life.
Proof of it by our service for Him—receiving constant religious training for all
kinds of service involved in the various committees. . .
Fellowship with those who love Him—interdenominational spiritual fellowship,
through which we hope not for organic unity, but to realize our Lord’s prayer
for spiritual unity, that all who believe in Him may be one.
Fidelity to our regiment in which we fight for Him—strenuous loyalty to the
local church and denomination with which each society is connected.
For more on the Christian Endeavor principles, see Clark, Christian Endeavor,
supra, pp.
89-102.
The Bible – As Sourcebook, Subject of Study, and as to Quotation of Verses
In early A.A., the Bible was studied to develop the basic recovery program
ideas. It was read and to be read daily. Circulated literature centered on the
Bible. Bible study was stressed, and the Bible was read at the beginning of each
meeting. When asked about a program question, Dr. Bob would usually say: “What
does it say in the Good Book.” He also frequently quoted relevant verses to AAs
and their families. Until very recently, Dr. Bob’s Bible (with inscriptions by
him, Bill Wilson, and Bill Dotson—A,A, Number Three) was brought to the front of
the A.A. Number One (King School Group) meeting room and there remained until
the meeting was over. Each AA meeting had a topic, and the topic was usually
based on some Bible idea, segment, or application (See Dick B., The Good Book
and The Big Book; The Akron Genesis of Alcoholics Anonymous; Why Early A.A.
Succeeded; When Early AAs Were Cured and Why)
The Bible occupied no less a prominent place in Christian Endeavor.
Its journal was called The Golden Rule with Rev. Clark as its editor-in chief
(Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, pp. 82, 622; Memories, supra, pp. 92, 97-98).
The covenant pledge was designed, among other purposes, to secure “familiarity
with the Word of God by promoting Bible-reading and study in preparation for
every meeting” (Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, p. 94). As mentioned, the
first point in the analysis of the covenant is “I will read the Bible.” The
pledge itself says: “that I will make it the rule of my life to pray and to read
the Bible every day. . .” “Every Endeavor meeting has its topic, with many
Scripture references and abundant helps.” “The Golden Rule. . . offered as a
premium at one time the well-known ‘International Bible,’ a famous teacher’s
Bible with notes by eminent scholars.” (Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, pp.
244, 252, 261, 293).
Bible study was often the subject of oratory at Christian Endeavor Conventions.
Speaking on some Christian Endeavor Principles, Rev. Russell H. Conwell—a
favorite convention speaker—said: “I believe that a pledge is a good thing. . .
. Hence I believe in the Christian Endeavor pledge to speak every week in the
meeting; it makes men. I believe in the advice of studying the Holy Bible for
itself; it makes men” (Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, p. 606). Said to be the
greatest preacher in England of his time, the Rev. Dr. J. H. Jowett said at the
British National Convention in Glasgow: “Let your endeavor grow out of the great
and studious contemplation of the great mysteries in Christ;” and Jowett was
speaking on “Christian Endeavor and Bible-Study” (Clark, Christian Endeavor,
supra, pp. 608-609).
Writing on the non-denominational and international character of Christian
Endeavor, Count Bernstorff, an eminent German Christian, wrote: “There is only
one Christianity, because there is only one Christ. Is it English that one
insists upon conversion. . . . Is it English to avow a oneness of spirit with
Christians of other denominations. . . . Is it English that one should seek
after holiness. . . . Is it English that all Christians should work together for
the upbuilding of Christ’s kingdom? All these things are simple biblical truths,
and should be the universal spirit of Christendom. Indeed, they constitute
living Christendom” (Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, pp. 618-619).
There is much more about the Bible in the Christian Endeavorer’s life and
meetings; and some will be discussed here, but most is being researched right
now.
The Prayer-Meetings – their content and importance
Dr. Amos R. Wells was Editorial Secretary of the United Society of Christian
Endeavor. His text-book on meetings and methods tell us much about the prayer
meetings. He wrote:
“What are the results we may gain from the prayer meeting? They are five:
original thought on religious subjects; open committal to the cause of Christ;
the helpful expression of Christian thought and experience; the cultivation of
the spirit of worship through public prayer and through singing; the guidance of
others along these lines of service and life.
“How can we get original thought on the prayer-meeting topics? Only by study of
the Bible, followed by meditation and observation. First, the Endeavorer should
read the Bible passage; then he should read some good commentary upon it; then
he should take the subject with him into his daily life for five or six days,
thinking about it in his odd minutes and watching for experiences in his own
life, or the lives of others, or of observing nature and looking for
illustrations on the subject from all these sources.
“Are we to read Bible verses and other quotations? Yes, all we please, if we
will make them the original expression of our own lives by thinking about them,
and adding to them something, if only a sentence, to show that we have made them
our own. Always give the writer’s name, or the part of the Bible from which you
quote. Commit the quotation to memory and do not read it” (Amos R. Wells, Expert
Endeavor: A Text-book of Christian Endeavor Methods and Principles. Boston:
United Society of Christian Endeavor, 1911, pp. 9-11; Dick B., Dr. Bob and His
Library, p. 114; The Books Early AAs Read for Spiritual Growth, 7th ed., pp.
13-17).
We now know that Dr. Bob’s wife said the Bible was the main source book of all
and that not a day should pass without reading it. We know that Dr. Bob read it
every day. We know that it was read at every one of the pioneer meetings and
each morning at the quiet times conducted by Anne Smith at the Smith home. And
we know how often Dr. Bob quoted Scripture to make some point. There were
“topics” at the early meetings, and many resembled those suggested by CE. There
were some limited testimonies. And there was group prayer to the extent that the
meetings were often Christian Fellowship meetings that were, in effect, “old
fashioned prayer meetings.”—the essence of the Christian Endeavor program (See
DR. BOB and the Good Oldtimers, supra, pp. 56, 71-72, 96-97, 100-102, 111, 116,
118-119, 129-136, 139-142, 144, 150-151; Dick B., Anne Smith’s Journal,
1933-1939).
The Quiet Hour – A regular Endeavor observance and a required AA pioneer
practice
“Quiet Time” was a “must” in early Akron A.A.; and, as trustee-to-be Frank Amos
reported it, “He [the alcoholic] must have devotions every morning—a ‘quiet time
of prayer and some reading from the Bible and other religious literature.” “The
A.A. members of that time did not consider meetings necessary to maintain
sobriety. They were simply ‘desirable.’ Morning devotion and ‘quiet time,’
however, were musts” (DR. BOB, supra, pp. 131, 136. In fact, Bill Wilson once
said: “I sort of always felt that something was lost from A.A. when we stopped
emphasizing the morning meditation.” (Bill and Lois themselves, however,
continued this practice together until his death in 1971)” See DR. BOB, supra,
p. 178).
Unfortunately, almost all A.A. writers have mischaracterized A.A. quiet times.
Possibly because they were steering wide of Jesus Christ and the Bible, probably
because they did not mention or want to mention the requisite “born again” part,
and mostly because they did not do their homework. First, quiet time was and
could be an individual thing, a morning thing, or a group thing; and it often
was any or all of these. Second, some of the Oxford Group trappings of
journaling and listening and writing down and checking were just not a
significant, if even relevant part, of Akron pioneer A.A. Finally, almost
invariably, A.A. revisionists have left out the need for becoming a child of God
in order to pray to and hear from our “Heavenly Father.” See Dick B., Good
Morning: Quiet Time, Morning Watch, Meditation, and Early A.A.; The Oxford Group
and Alcoholics Anonymous; New Light on Alcoholism.
Expressed in very simple terms, early AA “quiet time” involved these elements:
(1) Surrender first and being born-again of God’s spirit. (2) Studying the
Bible. (3) Prayer-both group and individual. (4) Using devotionals like The
Upper Room and The Runner’s Bible. (5) Seeking God’s guidance for their lives.
And here are the guidelines which were part of Dr. Bob’s Christian Endeavor
training as a youngster. Even more can be found in materials by The Rev Dr. F.
B. Meyer. And Founder Dr. Francis Clark wrote:
“Undoubtedly the effort that has done most to impress the deepest things of the
Spirit of God upon the Christian Endeavor movement is the so-called ‘Quiet
Hour.’ . . . . Because there may be some who read these pages who may not
understand the inner meaning of the Quiet Hour, or what the old writers
understand by ‘practising the presence of God,’ the writer. . . tries to tell
his young friends just how the Quiet Hour may be spent. ‘Our Bible is open,
perhaps to the familiar passage which reveals the wondrous truth that man dwells
in God, and God in man, as John records it. Seek to realize this stupendous
fact, for all Scripture is a lie if it is not a fact. Say to yourself over and
over again: ‘God is here. God is here. God is within me. I am His child. God is
my Father’.” (Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, pp. 525-526).
“So it was proposed that those who
wished should band themselves together in a purely voluntary organization called
‘the Comrades of the Quiet Hour.’ The name was chosen rather than the similar
name of ‘The Morning Watch’ in order to give the utmost freedom as to the time
which should be devoted to meditation and personal communion with God, though
the morning was strongly recommended. Those who became “comrades” agreed to
spend fifteen minutes a day not merely in Bible-reading and petition, but in
genuine personal communion with the Unseen. . . . Quiet Hour literature began to
abound; ‘Quiet Hours’ led by some of the most eminent Christians in the land
began to be held in connection with the conventions both State and national. Now
more than 40,000 have been definitely enrolled. . .” (Clark, Christian Endeavor,
supra, p. 357).
The Christian Endeavor/AA Emphasis
on Love and Service
There is very frequent mention in Christian Endeavor literature of the
importance of love, service and ministering. Dr. Clark wrote:
“Christian Endeavor is a watch
Whose mainspring is love,
Whose movement is service.
Whose hands point to heavenly joys on the dial of eternity” (Clark, Christian
Endeavor, supra, p. 316)
The following is a relevant,
succinct description of Endeavor’s position:
"...it is a fellowship based on a
broad platform of service, love to Christ, and work for Him. On this platform
all can stand." (Francs E. Clark. World Wide Endeavor: The Story of The Young
Peoples Society of Christian Endeavor, From the Beginning and In All Lands.
[Philadelphia, PA: Gillespie, Metzgar & Kelley], 1895, p. 263).
In his last, very brief, and much
quoted address to AAs, Dr. Bob made the following point—seemingly out of a
discerning memory of his youthful work in Christian Endeavor:
“Our Twelve Steps, when simmered
down to the last, resolve themselves into the words ‘love’ and ‘service.’ We
understand what love is, and we understand what service is. So let’s bear those
two things in mind” (DR. BOB, supra, p. 338).
The last paragraph of A.A.’s own
biographical sketch on Dr. Bob said:
“Dr. Bob firmly believed that ‘love
and service’ are the cornerstones of Alcoholics Anonymous” (The Co-Founders of
Alcoholics Anonymous: Biographical Sketches. Their Last Major Talks). NY:
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1972, 1975, p. 9).
The Necessity for Believing on Jesus
Christ:
The Bible makes the following very
specific comments about the way to salvation, the abundant life, and everlasting
life through Jesus Christ (and see John 3:1-8, 14-17; 10:9-10; 14:5-6):
“This Jesus hath God raised up,
whereof we are all witnesses. . . . Therefore let all the house of Israel know
assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord
and Christ” (Acts 2:32, 36)
“Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of
Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God hath raised from the dead,
even by him doth this man stand before you whole. . . . Neither is there
salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among
men, whereby we must be saved” Acts 4:10, 12).
“That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in
thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For
with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession
is made unto salvation. . . .For whoever shall call upon the name of the Lord
shall be saved” (Romans 10:9-10, 13}.
In early A.A., a surrender to, and
decision for, Christ was a “must”—though you’d hardly know it from reading
almost any history pertaining to Bill Wilson or the fellowship as a whole. But
the following statements by several A.A. pioneers in the Akron program describe
and verify the required early A.A. “surrender to Christ”:
‘They would not let you in unless
you surrendered to Jesus Christ on your knees” (From a recorded telephone
conversation with Danny W. in Lancaster, California, from A.A. old-timer Ed Andy
of Lorain, Ohio. The statement was made on January 9, 1993; see also, Dick B.,
The Golden Text of A.A., p. 31).
“They took me upstairs to be a born again human being and be God’s helper to
alcoholics” (Letter from Larry B., A.A. old-timer from Cleveland, Ohio to the
author, dated September 18, 1992. Larry stated that this quote correctly
described his surrender; see also, Dick B., The Golden Text of A.A., p. 32).
Clarence Snyder—who came into A.A.
in February of 1938 and was sponsored by Dr. Bob—said: “[I] went upstairs to T.
Henry Williams’s master bedroom with Dr. Bob, T. Henry Williams, and an Oxford
Group member. These men told [me] to get on [my] knees, and they joined me on
their knees around T. Henry’s bed. These three men then led [me] through a
‘Sinner’s Prayer’ . . . which was the very one Dr. Bob had used from the
beginning of A.A. surrenders in Akron” (See Dick B., Turning Point, pp. 140-142;
The Golden Text of A.A., p. 32; That Amazing Grace, p. 27; Clarence Snyder,
Going Through The Steps, p. 3; Mitch K., How It Worked, pp. 58, 70).
One would expect to see in Christian Endeavor literature countless examples of a
decision for, acceptance of, or surrender to, Christ, and the resultant born
again standing as sons of God. But that is not the case. Why? I am of the
opinion that the “altar call” or similar invitation was not mentioned with
frequency because the Endeavorer’s were already Christians, had already made
their profession of faith in the church, and in fact were already part of the
body of Christ. The Christian Endeavor pledge and program were designed to keep
young Christians fired up in the church, keep them giving confessions of Christ,
keep them supporting their church, and keep them serving their Lord and Saviour,
Jesus Christ.
Nonetheless, there is certainly discussion of decisions for Christ within
Christian Endeavor. See Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, p. 537. Note also what
James DeForest Murch wrote in Successful C.E. Prayer-Meetings. The book was
designed to spruce up, diversify, and multiply the various possible meetings
Endeavorers could hold. As to possible evangelistic meetings, Murch suggested:
“An Evangelistic Meeting. Pattern
your program after that of a modern revival meeting. A live leader of song
should have charge of the music. The songs should be songs of soul-winning. Have
a number of church-members to give brief testimonies and urge the young people
to make decisions for Christ. The minister should be invited to make a closing
exhortation and hear the confessions of faith, if such is the usual order.
Personal work prior to the meeting itself will make it more effective in every
way” (James DeForest Murch, Successful C.E. Prayer- Meetings (Cincinnati, OH:
The Standard Publishing Company, pp. 66-67).
“A Front-seat Meeting. Or this might be called a Reconsecration Meeting. . . .
At the close of the service let your minister give an invitation to all those
who want to reconsecrate themselves to their C.E. pledge to come forward and
occupy the front seats. Those who wish to accept Christ as their personal
Saviour should be included in this invitation. Those who have taken the front
seats should then kneel in prayer” (Murch, Successful C.E., supra, p. 72)
The Reverend Dr. Charles M. Sheldon
was an enthusiastic Christian Endeavor supporter (Clark, Christian Endeavor,
supra, pp. 283, 149, 330, 563, 595). He wrote the famous In His Steps, said to
be the most widely-read religious novel of all time, with over 8,000,000 copies
sold. His book was owned, read, and recommended by Dr. Bob, by his wife Anne
Smith, and by pioneer leader Henrietta Seiberling. Speaking about Christian
Endeavor evangelism and Sheldon’s suggestions, Rev. Francis Clark wrote in
Christian Endeavor, supra:
“The Sunday-evening after –meeting
is another rare opportunity for evangelistic service, into which many pastors
wisely press their Endeavorers. Dr. Charles M. Sheldon, as has been before
stated, advocates making this great young people’s evangelistic service of the
week for the actual bringing of men to a decision for Christ, and in his own
experience has proved the vast usefulness of such a plan (p. 330).
The Practical Test: What would Jesus
do?
There is a recurring “underground” expression uttered by A.A. old-timer
believers. You will encounter it from time to time when they suggest as a
solution for a quandary, “What would the Master say?” In his last major address
to AAs, Bill Wilson told this “Dr. Bob story” on the point:
“For example, a fellow came to Dr.
Bob and said, ‘I’m an alcoholic; here is my history. But I also have this other
‘complication.’ Can I join A.A.? Bob threw it out to all the other deacons,
while the poor guy waited.
“Finally, there was some kind of hearing on it among the self-appointed elders.
I remember how perfectly Bob put it to them. He reminded us that most of us were
practicing Christians. Then he asked, ‘What would the Master have thought? Would
he have kept this man away?’ He had them cold! The man came in, was a prodigious
worker, and was one of our most respected people” (The Co-Founders of Alcoholics
Anonymous: Biographical Sketches Their Last Major Talks. NY: Alcoholics
Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1972, 1975, p. 30).
There is a similar vein in the
approach by Dr. Bob himself in his last major address to AAs:
“I’m talking about the attitude of
every one of us toward our Heavenly Father. Christ said, ‘Of Myself, I am
nothing—My strength cometh from My Father in heaven.’ If He had to say that, how
about you and me? Did you say it? Did I say it? No. That’s exactly wht we didn’t
say. We were inclined to say instead, ‘Look me over, boys. Pretty good, huh?’ We
had no humility, no sense of having received anything through the grace of our
Heavenly Father” (Co-Founders, supra, p. 19).
I cannot declare that the “what
would Jesus do” idea in A.A. came from Christian Endeavor language Dr. Bob had
heard again and again. But I can say emphasize how popular Charles Sheldon’s
book was among the A.A. founders and pioneers. I can say that the expression,
“What would Jesus do” can be found in several important Christian Endeavor
writings. And I can say that nowhere is the background idea and humility
thinking more evident than in Christian Endeavor leader Sheldon’s In His Steps.
In fact, Sheldon begins his famous best-seller by quoting 1 Peter 2:21:
“For even hereunto were ye called:
because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should
follow his steps.”
Much of his story is about Henry
Maxwell, pastor of the First Church of Raymond; and early on, Sheldon quotes the
preacher as follows:
“I want volunteers from the First
Church who will pledge themselves, earnestly and honestly for an entire year,
not to do anything without first asking the question, ‘What would Jesus do?’
“Our motto will be, ‘What would Jesus do?’ Our aim will be to act as He would if
He was in our places, regardless of immediate results. In other words, we
propose to follow Jesus’ steps as closely and as literally as we believe He
taught His disciples to do” (Charles M. Sheldon. In His Steps—first published in
1897 (Old Tappan, NJ: Spire Books, published by Pyramid Publications, Inc. for
the Fleming H. Revell Company, 1963, p. 16).
In His Steps repeats this same
question over and over and over (pp. 21, 26, 28, 35, 38, 61, 63, 69, 73, 75, 84,
100, 104, 107, 110, 124, 134, 173, 174, 177, 183, 184, 188). The book
illustrates the use of this simple test in a host of life-situations. And the
test is not without Biblical context. Frequently, author Sheldon uses the
question in connection with (1) Walking obediently in Jesus’ steps (pp. 11, 124,
155, 189). (2) Following Jesus (pp. 11, 65, 124, 140). (3) The imitation of
Christ – which brought into play the Thomas a’Kempis book by that name, which
was owned by the pioneers, used by them in their Quiet Times, and even later
handed out to patients at St. Thomas by Sister Ignatia, who worked with Dr. Bob
for 10 years there. (4) Seeking the wisdom of God as Jesus did so often and as
believers are directed in the first chapter of the Book of James—a favorite in
early A.A.
Christian Endeavor, “Cure,” and early A.A.
Though recently published Alcoholics Anonymous literature has meticulously
erased Jesus Christ, the Bible, and over a decade of A.A. cures from the scene,
AA pioneers were cured. They said so. Reporters of their cures said so.
Countless news and journal articles said so. And—whatever current A.A. scribes
may say—cure is the proper word. And cured they were. They believed in the power
of God. They believed they could be cured. And they reported they were cured by
reliance on the Creator. No revisionist, secular, universalist writings can
change that! See: Dick B., God and Alcoholism: Our Growing Challenge in the 21st
Century; Cured: Proven Help for Alcoholics and Addicts; When Early AAs Were
Cured and Why; Richard K., Early A.A. – Separating Fact from Fiction: How
Revisionists Have Led Our History Astray; So You Think Drunks Can’t Be Cured:
Press Releases By Witnesses To the Cure; A New Light: “The First Forty” (All
three titles: Haverhill, MA: Golden Text Publishing Company, 2003).
In collaborative research and writing, and in independent and ongoing
investigations, Richard K. and I can tell you that this “cure” historical
researcht is a work-in-progress. The facts are there. The history is voluminous.
The analysis and dissemination has only begun! You will find hundreds and
hundreds of materials on early A.A. and Cure. You will probably find none in
Oxford Group writings or the Washingtonian history on the cure of alcoholism. It
is true, however, that a favorite Oxford Group expression was: “Sin the Problem.
Jesus Christ the Cure. The result: A Miracle.” And this should interest those
who define alcoholism as sin.
Christian Endeavor, however, was far ahead of its time in seeing the practical
application of the power of God and and producing miraculous cures in our lives.
I will not discuss it at length here, but Christian Endeavor spoke glowingly of
the work of Dr. E. D. Starbuck, published in his title, The Psychology of
Religion; and by Professor Coe who confirmed it.
Christian Endeavor had this to say:
“The Christian Endeavor Society may
also fairly claim from the beginning to have put into practical operation the
psychologist’s dictum already quoted, ‘No impression without expression.’ Long
before psychology was studied except by the learned few, long before it had
become a fad in certain quarters, the Society attempted to put into practice its
latest philosophy, and recognized the vital importance of religious activity to
supplement and round out religious instruction.
“’The cure for helplessness that comes with storm and stress in the period of
adolescence, says Professor Starbuck, ‘is often found in inducing wholesome
activity. ‘Faith without works is dead.’ Let us call to mind that storm and
stress and doubt are expressed sometime during youth by something like seventy
per cent of all the persons studied. On the other hand, heightened activity,
which is characterized not only by interest in religious matters, but by
engaging in actual religious work, was experienced by only about twenty per cent
of all these persons. This is doubtless very much out of proportion. Many
persons have found the solution of their difficulties by actually setting about
doing things’” (Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, pp. 228-229).
The foregoing quotes bespeak the
pre-occupation of religion and psychology of that day with “mind cure,” “new
thought,” and similar approaches mislabeled “conversion.” As we will mention in
a moment, the Christian Endeavor people were involved in temperance, and there
is no particular indication that this led them into the arena of curing drunks.
However, Sheldon’s In His Steps and the tremendous evangelism of Dwight Moody
certainly devoted a good deal of time to bringing salvation to drunks and
watching them be healed of their addiction. In the eyes of all these Christians,
drunks were not “powerless;” they were in need of a new birth accompanied by
spiritual, mental, and physical wholeness, forgiveness, and healing.
Temperance and Politics.
Some proponents of A.A., and a good many others, are very proud of, and
satisfied with, A.A.’s refusal to become involved in liquor issues. Regrettably,
this has led some to draw conclusions that Christians interested in temperance
were almost certain to fail as a group and in the alcohol field because of their
focus on “outside” and “political issues.” Invariably, the faulty and flawed
example of the Washingtonian Movement is cited. The group was large for a
moment, involved in liquor and temperance and politics for a moment, and
perished in a moment. The Oxford Group people were sometimes involved in
sobering up drunks as part of its life-changing program; and the Group devoted
its fair share of time to politicians, war, and other topical issues. Yet the
Oxford Group was hardly diminishing in importance when it turned itself
primarily to “world changing through life-changing.” Those later days brought
prominent national and international leaders, many foreign nations, and a good
many activist Americans and British into the scene between at least 1930 and
1950. It did not perish in its saving of drunks. In fact, some of its best-known
writers and long-surviving activists were not only drunks, but were cured of
drinking by the power of God. These included Rowland Hazard, Victor Kitchen,
Charles Clapp, Jr., F. Shepard Cornell, and later James Houck.
Wilson was fond of saying that the Washingtonians and the Oxford Group taught us
more about “what not to do” than “what to do.” But the statement was a canard.
The Washingtonians were long gone before Wilson picked up his first drink. And
the Oxford Group program formed the heart of Wilson’s 12 Steps and Big Book
writings.
Christian Endeavor was involved in temperance, political, and war issues. Dr.
Clark wrote:
“Temperance is always a burning
theme in Endeavor conventions in English- speaking countries, and sometimes
practical temperance measures are taken, as when the Endeavorers of Boston,
seeing that one of the rumsellers, like most of the other shopkeepers of Boston,
had hung out the sign, ‘Welcome Endeavorers!” took him at his word, went into
the saloon, and held a prayer-meeting before the bar” (Clark, Christian
Endeavor, supra, p. 196)
“TEMPERANCE WORK. A society temperance pledge may be hung upon the wall, with
the signatures of all members upon it. Plan for temperance meetings long in
advance, and make them as strong as possible. Introduce into every temperance
meeting some account of recent temperance victories, and the progress of the
movement. Obtain addresses now and then from temperance enthusiasts. Learn what
are the temperance laws of your own State and community, and how they are kept.
How long since your town held a temperance mass-meeting? Plan one and hold it.
Why should not the temperance committee learn, for the information of voters,
the position as to temperance of the candidates before the people for election”
(Clark, Christian Endeavor, supra, p. 584).
Christian Endeavor was founded in
1881. It had soon had world-wide membership and significance. And it was and is
embraced by far more Protestant clergy and churches over the long-run than the
Washingtonians and Oxford Groupers could ever claim. It may properly be said, to
the extent that Christian Endeavor ideas were a major force in the foundation of
Akron A.A., that Christian Endeavor taught the pioneers what to do. And they did
it with astonishing success. Yet Christian Endeavor itself never laid a glove on
them. The AAs applied the ideas by personal decisions for Christ, reliance on
the Creator, Bible study, old fashioned prayers and prayer meetings, quiet
times, “works,” fellowship, love and service.
END
Note:
This is the first of several
roundtable articles which will be written about A.A. and Christian Endeavor.
“More will be revealed,” as some AAs like to say. Much more is being collected
and read. Many books and materials are under review. A good deal of personal
investigation is taking place in New England where it all began and where both
Bill Wilson and Dr. Bob were born, raised, and educated.
Bibliography specifics can be found in title descriptions on the Dick B.
website:
http://www.dickb.com/titles.shtml. Dick B. can be contacted by email (dickb@dickb.com),
phone/fax: 808 874 4876; and mail to PO Box 837, Kihei, HI 96753-0837. Richard
K. can be contacted by phone at 978 257 3066 and mail to 10 Primrose Way #8309,
Haverhill, MA 01830. Also in Dick B., Making Known the Biblical History of
Alcoholics Anonymous (http://www.dickb.com/makingknown.shtml).
Most of the major historical books and articles are already located at and
available for view and study at the Griffith House Library, The Wilson House,
East Dorset, Vermont.

Dick B. © 2005

This website is designed and maintained by
American Creations of Maui
Contact:
webmaster@americreations.com; (661)965-2536
American Creations of Maui
Maui Website
Design at
http://americreations.com
|